What is The Liberal World Order

 Joe Biden, the mentally challenged, corrupt, geriatric in charge made mention of 'the Liberal World Order.' Brian Deese, one of his advisers, made mention of it during a CNN interview. So, what, exactly, is the Liberal World Order?

World101 explains it like this: After World War II countries sought to ensure the world never again devolved into such horrific violence.

World leaders created a series of international organizations and agreements to promote global cooperation on issues including security, trade, health, and monetary policy. The United States has championed this system—known as the liberal world order—for the past seventy-five years. During this time, the world has enjoyed unprecedented peace and prosperity.

But these institutions are far from perfect, and today they are struggling to address new sources of disorder, such as climate change and a deadly pandemic. What’s more, democracy is on the decline around the world, authoritarianism is on the rise, and countries like China are deliberately chipping away at the liberal world order, creating parallel institutions of their own. Faced with these challenges, will the liberal world order survive? If a new system emerges, what will that mean for freedom, peace, and prosperity worldwide? (https://world101.cfr.org/how-world-works-and-sometimes-doesnt/global-governance/what-liberal-world-order)

Some of those institutions have become corrupted. The UN Security Council has become antisemitic to the point of actually trying to destroy Israel. The World Health Organization is controlled by the Chinese. The World Bank dictates to countries how to govern if they loan to them, as does the International Monetary Fund.

Once an institution is organized and given power over anything, it soon becomes corrupt. The old adage 'Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely' stands true. All one has to do is look at our own government. The Founding Fathers were terrified of a large and powerful government. They intentionally limited the power of the Federal Government and enumerated those powers in the Constitution. Over the decades and centuries, our limited government has increased in size and taken power it does not possess.

Now, our President is throwing around the term 'Liberal World Order.' What does he mean by that? Does he mean the literal definition as set forth after WWII or does he mean something much more nefarious? Liberalism has become synonymous with Socialism and, to a point, Communism in this country. The far-left radicals, Progressives, Marxists, and Democratic Socialists that have taken over in our government are called 'Liberals.'

Let's take a look at the definition of liberalism. The following definitions are from the online Merriam Webster dictionary:

Liberalism noun

lib·​er·​al·​ism | \ ˈli-b(ə-)rə-ˌli-zəm  \

Definition of liberalism

1: the quality or state of being liberal

2:a:often capitalized : a movement in modern Protestantism emphasizing intellectual liberty and the spiritual and ethical content of Christianity

b: a theory in economics emphasizing individual freedom from restraint and usually based on free competition, the self-regulating market, and the gold standard (see GOLD STANDARD sense 1)

c: a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy (see AUTONOMY sense 2) of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties specifically : such a philosophy that considers government as a crucial instrument for amelioration of social inequities (such as those involving race, gender, or class)

d:capitalized : the principles and policies of a Liberal (see LIBERAL entry 1 sense 6b) party

Gold Standard noun

Definition of gold standard

1: a monetary standard under which the basic unit of currency is defined by a stated quantity of gold and which is usually characterized by the coinage and circulation of gold, unrestricted convertibility of other money into gold, and the free export and import of gold for settling of international obligations

Autonomy noun

au·​ton·​o·​my | \ ȯ-ˈtä-nə-mē  \

plural autonomies

Definition of autonomy

1: the quality or state of being self-governing especially : the right of self-government The territory was granted autonomy.

2: self-directing freedom and especially moral independence personal autonomy

3: a self-governing state

Liberal adjective

lib·​er·​al | \ ˈli-b(ə-)rəl  \

Definition of liberal

 (Entry 1 of 2)

1a: of, relating to, or based on the liberal artsliberal education

b: archaic : of or befitting a man of free birth

2a: marked by generosity : OPENHANDEDa liberal giver

b: given or provided in a generous and openhanded way a liberal meal

c: AMPLE, FULL

3:obsolete : lacking moral restraint : LICENTIOUS

4: not literal or strict : LOOSEa liberal translation

5: BROAD-MINDED especially : not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms

6a: of, favoring, or based upon the principles of liberalism

b:capitalized : of or constituting a political party advocating or associated with the principles of political liberalism especially : of or constituting a political party in the United Kingdom associated with ideals of individual especially economic freedom, greater individual participation in government, and constitutional, political, and administrative reforms designed to secure these objectives

Liberal noun

lib·​er·​al | \ ˈli-b(ə-)rəl  \

Definition of liberal (Entry 2 of 2)

: a person who is liberal: such as

a: one who is open-minded or not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional, or established forms or ways

b:capitalized : a member or supporter of a liberal political party (see LIBERAL entry 1 sense 6)

c: an advocate or adherent of liberalism especially in individual rights

As you can see, what conservatives call liberals are far from it on most points. Individual freedoms and rights, self-governing, open-minded, generosity, etc. Where the definition does come straight to what a liberal is here in the United States is; lacking moral restraint, not bound by traditional forms, and a philosophy that considers government as a crucial instrument for amelioration of social inequities (such as those involving race, gender, or class). The Founders did not believe that government had any business in dictating to the People how to live their lives or even being that important to the everyday operation of the country as a whole. The Democrat Party believes that only government can know what is best for the people and demands that the country follow laws enacted that inhibit, control, regulate, and even criminalize activities that were once everyday living; things like fishing, hunting, owning a firearm, speaking your mind openly, being able to travel unrestricted without being taxed (having a driver's license, licensing a motor vehicle, tolls, etc.).

So, what does Uncle Dementia mean when he says we must endure great hardship to ensure the Liberal World Order? They speak about the Russia/Ukraine war and how this is the main purpose of increasingly high fuel prices. A foreign war that we are not fighting has nothing to do with our economy. Yes, we are sending arms and humanitarian aid to Ukraine, as we should. Does that mean that we need to buy our oil from OPEC? Does that mean that our store shelves should be empty? Does this 75 year old policy mean that we, the United States of America, and the rest of the world, should suffer because Vlad wants to put the Soviet Union back together?

The Liberal World Order has nothing to do with turning prosperous nations into poverty stricken hellholes. It is an antiquated policy that was supposed to rebuild Europe after the devastation of war. The European countries were struggling with economic, social, and health issues and the LWO was to help them recover. Now, its primary mission is to redistribute the wealth of the world to countries that are struggling and considered less economically viable than the industrialized nations. China, the second largest economy in the world receives billions of dollars annually from the World Bank because it falls into their category of needing help. India receives billions of dollars annually because it has the largest population of poor people. Who funds the World Bank? Everyone that has a good economy. The United States has over a 16% interest in it. After all, up until Joe Biden, we had the strongest, largest economy in the world.

When Dementia Joe talks about the Liberal World Order, it's up for grabs what, exactly, he's talking about. My guess is that he is talking about the 'Great Reset' into Socialism/Communism here in the United States but, he could be talking about the WWII policy that should have been done and over with decades ago. Only the Democrats know for sure.

Comey and McCabe's IRS Audit

Well, well, well. James Comey, former FBI Director under Barack Hussein Obama, and Andrew McCabe, former Acting Director of the FBI under Donald J Trump are being audited by the Internal Revenue Service and they think it's not fair. There has to be some nefarious dealings from President Trump for the IRS to single out two former FBI directors at the same time.

The Huffington Post reports that both men went on the record to air their sentiments. Comey, as we all know, exonerated Hillary Clinton from any wrongdoing in the personal server and email debacle, and McCabe, was, is, and always shall be a Democrat hack working against Trump. Both men signed off on FISA Court requests for wiretapping of the Trump campaign, transition, and administration on information that was not verified. Trump bashed them both and even called Comey a traitor.

The Huffington Post reported, “The random audits are extremely rare, and it’s highly unlikely for an American to get selected. The Times noted just 5,000 people were selected in 2017 out of 153 million returns, or about 1 in 30,600. There’s no evidence that the IRS, which is currently headed by Trump appointee Charles Rettig, acted with any impropriety.” What gets me about this statement is that they say it is extremely rare for 'an American to get selected.' Wow! I did taxes for over five years and was involved in a minimum of a dozen audits by the IRS. So, that being said, just how rare is it to get audited by the IRS? It all depends on what kind of deductions you've taken and what income you've reported and if there is any discrepancy between that and what was reported to IRS by 1099's and W2's. Seems to me that the left owned HuffPost is trying to make it sound like it's not right for these two to be audited.

Comey and McCabe made statements to the New York Times and CNN according to the Huffington Post: “I don’t know whether anything improper happened, but after learning how unusual this audit was and how badly Trump wanted to hurt me during that time, it made sense to try to figure it out,” Comey said in a statement to the Times. “Maybe it’s a coincidence or maybe somebody misused the I.R.S. to get at a political enemy. Given the role Trump wants to continue to play in our country, we should know the answer to that question.”

McCabe also said he had “significant questions about how or why I was selected.”

“It just defies logic to think that there wasn’t some other factor involved,” he said later Wednesday on CNN. “I think that’s a reasonable question. I think it should be investigated. People need to be able to trust the institutions of government and so that’s why there should be some ― we should dig through this and find out what happened.”

Read what each one said again. Comey stated that Trump wanted to hurt him. Wasn't it he, James Comey, that pushed the fake dossier about Trump/Russia collusion? Wasn't it Comey that did everything he could to hurt a sitting President, even to the point of taking notes of conversations with him that he 'leaked' to the press? I really don't think Trump did anything but bash him repeatedly about his treasonous behavior.

McCabe, on the other hand, saying that 'people need to be able to trust the institutions of government' is nothing less than a joke coming from him. He abused his power and was very instrumental in the people of the country mistrusting the institutions of the government. He is still wanting anything Trump investigated. Seems to me that these two are still treasonous weasels that need to be tried and convicted for attempting a coup of the Trump Administration.

One other statement that Comey made is also ridiculous coming out of his mouth: 'given the role Trump wants to continue to play in our country...' That made me almost fall out of my chair! Let's list a few of the Democrats that are still wanting to play a part in our country. Hillary Rodham Clinton just won't go away. Barack Hussein Obama has actually gone to foreign countries and tried to make policy. Hunter Biden and his foreign business dealings with no experience in said businesses.

CNN reported that Obama met with Angela Merkel on the same day that she met with Trump. He was there to discuss democracy and faith. It hasn't gone unnoticed that the German Chancellor prefers Obama over Trump. That being said, was Obama's visit only personal and on behalf of his foundation or, was he playing politics against the sitting President? Is it against the law for a citizen to visit a foreign government? Technically, no. The Logan Act states:

“Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

The question is, did Obama violate the Logan Act? Only he and Merkel know for sure.

So, Comey and McCabe are upset about getting audited. If they didn't break IRS law they shouldn't have anything to worry about. That's what IRS agents tell taxpayers when they get audited. Since these two treasonous clowns are worried about it and want it to be investigated, maybe there were some shady dealings that need looked into. That's what the Dems said when Trump didn't want his taxes opened up for everyone to see. The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds.

As Andrew Wilkow says, “Socialism is for the people, not the Socialist.” Equality under the law is only for conservatives because the left seems to be getting by with breaking every law they can unmolested by those nasty law enforcement officers, Congressional investigations, being indicted, charged, tried, convicted, or sentenced. As the FBI tracks down and imprisons people that went to the Trump rally and then to the Capitol Complex on January 6, 2020, there are still hundreds, if not thousands, of rioters, looters, arsonists, and people that assaulted innocent bystanders running the streets free and clear.

There are still Congressional members that incited riots, condoned the arson, even put up GoFundMe pages to get some of those criminals out of jail that act like they are the pillars of the community. Yes, Congressionmen are exempt from prosecution for anything while in those hallowed halls or going to or from the Capitol. What seems to be missing is that the Constitution states that: “They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest...” How many Congressmen breached the peace while Trump was in office? Max Waters screaming in public to harass other representatives wherever they may be is a great example. Omar, AOC, Tlaib, Pressley, Booker, Harris, all have made spectacles of themselves in public that got a crowd pretty excited and wanting to hurt conservatives. Even now, members of Congress are saying it's alright to protest in front of Supreme Court Justices houses. We all know what a 'peaceful protest' looks like when it's from the far-left.

I know. I get a little off track sometimes. There is so much that coincides with the main topic that I just can't help myself. I also know that it seems as though I am an avid Trump supporter. I am not. I don't like the man, personally. He can be a petulant child, egotistical, doesn't know when to stop on certain things, etc. What I do support is Trump's America First policies and his unshakable patriotism. I am not protecting Donald J Trump when I give my opinions on what the left is doing, or has done against him. I am protecting our God-given rights and freedoms, our Constitution, our Flag, the Rule of Law. These are things that the Democrats have openly and blatantly disrespected and are continuing to try to overturn. If you can't see that from the 'news' reports and what is happening around the country, then you, my friend, are either completely brainwashed or a card-carrying member of the Party.

The Supreme Court, Again, and The Liberal World Order

 

Once again the Supreme Court is at the forefront of the news cycle. This time concerning election law.

The Constitution clearly states: Article One, Section Four, Paragraph One - “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators. “

What does this actually say? The State legislatures have the power to choose the times, places, and manner of holding election for SENATORS and REPRESENTATIVES. That is, unless Congress gets a wild hair and decides it wants to do something different. The state Governors and courts have absolutely NOTHING to do with the election process. Nothing, nilch, nada, finite. The legislature of each state hold the power, PERIOD.

Because gerrymandering has been allowed for decades, the legislatures of each state have done everything they can to keep one party in power. I don't think I need to reiterate which party has done that the most and is doing everything it can to do it nationwide.

All it took was for the High Court to say it would consider hearing the case on election law. Wow! Did the zealots ever come out of the woodwork on that. Since the Court took the State of New York down a notch or two and then overturned Roe v Wade, the virtue signalers, advocates, and activists have been having a heyday with them. They are the highest court in the nation. They don't legislate, they interpret the Constitutionality of the law. The Democrat Party has used the Court to legislate for them; especially when their policy wouldn't pass regular legislative process. This is called abuse of the high Court, abuse of power, and corruption.

The Supreme Court is supposed to be non-partisan; leaning neither left nor right but strictly by Constitutional law and precedent. The problem is that the Democrat Party has perverted the Court by appointing Justices that don't interpret the Constitution as written or intended, but as a 'living document' that changes with the political tide. The Republican Party has, by and large, tried to appoint Originalists as Justices; people that would interpret the Law of the Land as the Founders intended to be.

With a conservative majority on the Court, political activism is less likely to occur. Does it? Of course it does, at least in the eyes of the liberal left. If they don't get their way, if things to go the way they want, they scream that the Justices are not doing their job right. If the Constitution says that the people have the right to keep and bear arms and the Court decides that we, the People, do have that right, the liberal left screams that they are just conservative puppets legislating from the bench. All the Court is doing is making a Constitutionally sound decision.

According to The Washington Post, the committee investigating the Jan 6 debacle “ has offered fresh evidence suggesting President Donald Trump sought to disrupt the congressional counting of electoral votes to allow state legislatures time to send alternate slates of electors as part of a bid to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

“State legislatures have already introduced or enacted laws in a number of GOP-controlled states that voting rights groups say make it more difficult to cast a ballot. Experts say if the Supreme Court adopts the independent legislature theory, it would give state lawmakers ultimate control over election-related decisions like redistricting, as well as issues such as voting qualifications and voting by mail.”

I'd like to know who these 'experts' are. Probably the same people that fact-check Facebook posts. Left to the Democrat Party, anyone in the country would be able to vote whether a citizen or not, ballot harvesting would go unchecked, third-party drop boxes would be on every street corner, mail-in ballots would be the norm without verifying the ID of who sent it, etc. In other words, the Democrats want to change the election laws so that they can cheat legally.

As for President Trump disrupting the counting of electoral votes – it has come to pass that a lot of votes were fraudulent. Arizona being the one that comes to mind finding more than enough fake ballots that Trump would have won that state. Of course, the states that were the most questionable waited until way too late to do an audit. It should have been done in November 2020 when Donald J Trump and most of the nation wanted it done. He was in the right to demand audits and alternate electors. It's kinda hard to 'overturn' a rigged election when no one will even look at any evidence of fraud and corruption.

“This is part of a broader strategy to make voting harder and impose the will of state legislatures regardless of the will of the people,” said Suzanne Almeida, director of state operations for Common Cause, a nonpartisan pro-democracy group. “It is a significant change to the power of state courts to rein in state legislatures.” This, also, coming from The Washington Post. I would like to know what these state legislatures are doing that is making voting harder. Are they asking for voter ID, to be an American citizen, to be a registered voter? If the conservative right is anything, it is for fair and legal voting. It is the liberal left that wants anything but fair and legal voting. After all, it's a well known fact that, with how far left they have gone, there isn't a Democrat running that could win a fair and legal election. Except in California, New York, Illinois, Michigan, and a couple of other states where the gerrymandering has made it next to impossible for a conservative to win.

As far as a state's legislature going against the will of the people, that's what elections are for – to get rid of those that do just that. The only place, it seems, that this process doesn't hold true is for the Federal legislature. There are very few Congressmen that are doing what the people want. Most are drafting, and passing, bills for what makes them more powerful, more wealthy, and damn near impossible to get out of office.

Greg Guttfield commented on Fox News' The Five 'to a Biden administration official defending high gas prices and inflation as necessary to defending the "liberal world order." “What a scary fast trip from America first to America last. That "liberal world order" phrase used to be something you might hear somebody on infomercials say – I'm sorry InfoWars say. But it actually was said, it was actually said out loud. That one sound bite should be in every commercial for every Republican campaign. You should play that liberal world order blurb to truckers, to parents buying food, to delivery workers, because it's this kind of, it's one of the biggest, like, reveals in history, in political history.” This as reported by Fox News.

Fox News also reported: “White House economic adviser Brian Deese suggested the pain at the pump was a price Americans had to pay for the "future of the liberal world order," in a CNN interview on Thursday.

"CNN Newsroom" host Victor Blackwell played a clip of President Biden telling a reporter at Thursday's NATO Summit that Americans can continue to pay a premium for gas "as long as it takes" to win the war in Ukraine.

Blackwell asked Deese how the White House would respond to Americans worried that they won't be able to survive paying close to or over $5 a gallon, potentially for "years" to come.

"The military analysts, the Director of National Intelligence say this can be a long war measured in years. I think everybody understands why this is happening. But is it sustainable? What do you say to those families that say, 'Listen, we can't afford to pay $4.85  a gallon for months, if not years. This is just not sustainable,'" Blackwell questioned.

Deese initially responded, "What you heard from the president today was a clear articulation of the stakes. This is about the future of the liberal world order, and we have to stand firm." The comment caused a stir on social media.”

While Deese continued on extolling the 'economic advances' that the country was enjoying, he talked about a 'transition.' “When asked what he meant by "transition," Deese said the administration wanted to return the economy to a much better place than it was under the Trump administration.

"The economy pre-pandemic was not working for a lot of middle class families," the economics adviser claimed.”

What great economic recovery are we going through? Middle class Americans are suffering more than they have in decades. Gas prices are higher than ever. Inflation is out of control. Our jobs are, once again, going overseas. We are now, once again, dependent on OPEC and other foreign oil barons instead of energy independent. The Democrats have never made America great. The Biden Administration continually downgrades all the advances that Donald Trump made for America. He said it in a speech soon after the inauguration, “The America First Policy is over. We are a global economy.”

The scary part was what Deese said about the 'liberal world order.' Just what is this 'liberal world order?' Does this mean that, come hell or high water, the United States of America, a Constitutional Republic is definitely going to be changed into a Socialist State and become the United Socialist States of America? Only your local Democratic Socialist, or a die-hard AOC fan can say for sure.

If you haven't gotten enough intel to show you just what the Democrat Party is doing and what they want to accomplish, you are not paying attention, or you are part of the problem. One person can only do so much. But, it only takes one person to stand up and say, “This isn't right! This has got to change.” Once that one person does it, it gives others the courage to do the same. Suddenly, that one person becomes ten, then a hundred, then a thousand, and so forth. As is written in the Declaration of Arbroath in 1320, “As long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours, that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself". We don't have to worry about English rule anymore. What we have to worry about is a tyrannical dominion far worse. The sentiment is there, though.

Quotes are great. They say what a lot of us actually feel but can't put into words. The problem with quotes from great statesmen, politicians, philosophers, poets, writers, etc., is that they mean nothing. A quote is a quote is a quote but actions, well, actions speak so much louder than words. It's time for red-blooded American patriots got off their arses and DID SOMETHING! America isn't going to fix itself without someone doing something. NOW IS THE TIME! It's almost to a point of no return. There are many, many patriots that have been predicting and warning and no one has heeded the call. It's now or never, America.

The Supreme Court v New York Decision on Gun Control

 The Supreme Court just overturned a New York law that prohibits lawfully licensed people to carry firearms outside the home. Justice Thomas wrote wrote a 63 page majority opinion explaining why. Justice Alito, on the other hand, had much more to say, especially to Justice Breyer, who wrote the dissent.

Breyer spent most of his dissent quoting statistics on gun violence, including suicide, as a reason to back the New York law. Alito argued back that the liberal Justices, especially Breyer, were just saying, “guns are bad.”

MSN News reported, 'Breyer -- in writing what may be one of his last big dissents before retirement -- struck back.

"I am not simply saying that 'guns are bad,'" he said.

But he said that balancing "lawful uses" against the "dangers of firearms" is primarily the responsibility of elected bodies such as legislatures.

"Justice Alito asks why I have begun my opinion by reviewing some of the dangers and challenges posed by gun violence," he said.

Breyer said he did so because the "question of firearm regulation presents a complex problem -- one that should be solved by legislatures and not courts."'

My only question to the liberal Justices is this: What is in the Second Amendment that says the legislature can infringe on the people's right to keep and bear arms? Were does it say that only government employees are allowed to own and carry firearms?

Our so-called representatives aren't really representing the people that have given the authority to legislate and those representatives are inserting Justices and judges that are not following the Constitution of the United States of America.

The Second Amendment has been a big deal to government for quite some time. Our elected officials seem to think it is their duty to just wipe away our Constitutionally guaranteed rights, especially for protecting ourselves from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Why are they doing everything they can to disarm the American People? Conspiracy theory says it's because they want to do things they could get shot for.

When Madison initially introduced the various proposed amendments that would later become the Bill of Rights, he proposed to insert the bulk of them, including what would later become amendments one through five, part of the sixth amendment, and amendments eight and nine, into Article I, Section 9, between Clauses 3 and 4.  His speech to Congress can be found here.

This is the portion of the Constitution which limits Congressional power over individuals.  Clause 3 is the prohibition on Bills of Attainder and ex post facto laws.

Clause 4 is the limitation on the imposition of taxes directly on individuals as oppose to excise taxes on economic transactions.  This clause has been substantially abrogated by the sixteenth amendment, authorizing the federal government to tax incomes.  In other words, Madison proposed to put these amendments into that part of the Constitution that protected individual rights of the people from the federal government. The context of Madison’s original introduction to Congress of the Bill of Rights, including the second amendment, is powerful evidence supporting the conclusion that the right to keep and bear arms was intended to confirm an individual right of the people to arms. (Madison on the 2nd Amendment & milita clause | Human Events – Bearing Arms )

Here are ten quotes from the Federalist Papers concerning the People's right to keep and bear arms:

1. “The Constitution shall never be construed… to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.” – Samuel Adams

2. “…arms like laws discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside… Horrid mischief would ensue were one half the world deprived of the use of them….” – Thomas Paine

        3.“To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be                 taught alike, especially when young, how to use them…”- Richard Henry Lee

        4.“The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole                 body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that             can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.” – Noah Webster

       5.“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-                   digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such                     manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military,                 supplies.” – George Washington

        6.“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their             people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.” – Thomas Jefferson

        7.“The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who             are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the                 assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides,             for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas                 Jefferson

        8.“I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.”             – George Mason

        9.“A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …” – Richard Henry Lee

        10.“The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of                         them.”- Zachariah Johnson

(10 Essential Quotes On The 2nd Amendment From Our Founding Fathers (thefederalistpapers.org)

There should be absolutely no debate at all about the People's rights. The Constitution is a legal document, not an opinion. What if the courts decided to 'interpret' the law codes however they wanted? Oh, hang on, they do; at least when it comes to the far-left radical Democrats. As far as conservative Republicans, well, the law is the law and no one is above the law.

Kudos to the Supreme Court for taking the State of New York down a notch or two. Now, if only Congress would actually stick to their Oath of Office and uphold the Constitution instead of shredding it.

Executive Orders of Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr 2.0

 Here are some more of Joe Biden's Executive orders and what they entail.

Executive Order 14029 of May 14, 2021: Revocation of Certain Presidential Actions and Technical Amendment:

Revocation of Presidential Actions. The following...are revoked: EO 13925 of May 28, 2020 (Preventing Online Censorship), EO 13933 of June 26, 2020 (Protecting American Monuments, Memorials, and Statues and Combating Recent Criminal Violence), EO 13934 of July 2, 2020 (Building and Rebuilding Monuments to American Heroes), EO 13980 of January 18, 2021 (Protecting Americans From Overcriminalization Through Regulatory Reform).

Executive Order 14023 of April 9, 2021: Establishment of the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States:

There is established the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States.

FUNCTIONS: The Commission shall produce a report for the President that includes the following:

An account of the contemporary commentary and debate about the role and operation of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system and about the functioning of the constitutional process by which the President nominates and, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoints Justices to the Supreme Court;

The historical background of other periods in the Nation's history when the Supreme Court's role and the nominations and advice-and-consent process were subject to critical assessment and prompted proposals for reform; and

An analysis of the principal arguments in the contemporary public debate for and agaisnt Supreme Court reform, including an appraisal of the merits and legality of particular reform proposals.

Executive Order 14022 of April 1, 2021: Termination of Emergency With Respect to the International Criminal Court:

…,I hereby terminate the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13928 of June 11, 2020 (Blocking Property of Certain Persons Associated With the International Criminal Court) and revoke that order, and further order:

Section 1. In light of the revocation of Executive Order 13928, the suspension of entry as immigrants and nonimmigrants of individuals meeting the criteria set forth in section 1(a) of that order will no longer be in effect as of the date of this order and such individuals will no longer be treated as persons covered by Presidential Proclamation 8639 of July 24. 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Executive Order 14019 of March 7, 2021 Promoting Access to Voting:

(Summary) Because people of color and those that reside in poor neighborhoods are burdened by things such as: difficulties with voter registration, lack of election information, and barriers to access at polling places. Black and other voters of color have faced discriminatory policies and other obstacles... They are burdened by long lines at polling places and voter ID laws and have limited opportunities to vote by mail. Limited access to language assistance. Disabled voters face barriers to voting and are denied legally required accommodations in exercising their rights and ability to vote privately and independently.

It goes on and on with ways to give help to underprivileged, poor, and black people by helping them fill out their registrations and vote-by-mail applications, making sure they have all the information and not disinformation on issues, candidates, policy, registration, and in their own language. (Opinion; in other words – register and vote for them.)

Executive Order 14018 of February 24, 2021 Revocation of Certain Presidential Actions:

The following Presidential actions are revoked: EO 13772 of February 3, 2017 (Core Principles for Regulation the United States Financial System), EO 13828 of April 10,2018 (Reducing Poverty in America by Promoting Opportunity and Economic Mobility), EO 13924 of May 19, 2020 (Regulatory Relief To Support Economic Recovery), Memorandum of September 2, 2020 (Reviewing Funding to State and Local Government Recipients of Federal Funds That Are Permitting Anarch, Violence, and Destruction in American Cities), EO 13979 of January 18, 2021 (Ensuring Democratic Accountability in Agency Rulemaking).

Executive Order 14016 of February 17, 2021: Revocation of Executive Order 13801

Executive Order 13801 of June 15, 2017 (Expanding Apprenticeships in America), is hereby revoked.

Executive Order 14013 of February 4, 2021: Rebuilding and Enhancing Programs To Resettle Refugees and Planning for the Impact of Climate Change on Migration:

(Summary): This EO does away with a lot of the time consuming vetting of refugees and immigrants. It also gives refugees and immigrants full rights and privileges of the American citizen and makes it easier for said peoples to become citizens.

Executive Order 14012 of February 2, 2021: Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Intergration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans

(Summary) Once again, it is basically stating that all new immigrants will be treated as American citizens with all the rights and privileges of such.

Executive Order 14010 of February 2, 2021: Creating a Comprehensive Regional Framework To Address the Causes of Migration, To Manage Migration Throughout North and Central America, and To Provide Safe and Orderly Processing of Asylum Seekers at the United States Border

(Summary and Opinion): Why do we, as a nation, have to pay to figure out why people migrate here when we all know it's because Uncle Joe has invited everyone in? As for asylum seekers – they are to ask for asylum FROM THEIR HOME COUNTRY, not at the border or in the interior of our nation.

All this EO does is give credence to this regime's open border policy

Executive Order 14009 of January 28, 2021: Strengthening Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act

(Summary) This EO gives credence to the Unconstitutional ACA and, regardless of what the American people have said, strengthens it. Throughout the Order, Uncle Joe keeps saying how much the ACA has helped lower costs, has increased the number of participants (he doesn't say that it's forced on us), and how much better health care is because of it.

Executive Order 14005 of January 25, 2021: Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America's Workers

(Summary) Buy American made. Unless it's cheaper if it's foreign made or against the Democrat Party's agenda of 'no American oil.'

Executive Order 13993 of January 20, 2021: Revision of Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities

Section 1. (Summary) Ease up on immigration policy. After all, it's a complex thing to follow immigration law.

Section 2. EO 13768 of January 25, 2017 (Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States) is hereby revoked.

Executive Order 13992 of January 20, 2021: Revocation of Certain Executive Orders Concerning Federal Regulation

EO 13771 of January 30, 2017 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs), EO 13777 of February 24, 2017 (Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda), EO 13875 of June 14, 2019 (Evaluating and Improving the Utility of Federal Advisory Committees), EO 13891 of October 9, 2019 (Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents), EO 13892 of Oct 9, 2019 (Promoting the Rule of Law Through Transparency and Fairness in Civil Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication), EO 13893 of October 10, 2019 (Increasing Government Accountability for Administrative Actions by Reinvigorating Administrative PAYGO), are hereby revoked.

Executive Order 13990 of January 20, 2021: Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science To Tackle the Climate Crisis

Section 1. Policy. Our Nation has an abiding commitment to empower our workers and communities' promote and protect our public health, and the environment' and conserve our national treasures and monuments, places the secure our national memory. Where the Federal Government has failed to meet that commitment in the past, it must advance environmental justice. In carrying out this charge, the Federal Government must be guided by the best science and be protected by processes that ensure the integrity of Federal decision-making. It is, therefore, the policy of my Administration to listen to the science' to improve public health and protect our environment to ensure access to clean air and water' to limit exposure to dangerous chemicals and pesticides' to hold polluters accountable, including those who disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income communities; to reduce greenhouse gas emissions' to bolster resilience to the impacts of climate change' to restore and expand our national treasures and monuments' and to prioritize both environmental justice and the creation of the well-paying union jobs necessary to deliver on these goals.

To that end, this order directs all executive departments and agencies to immediately review and, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, take action to address the promulgation of Federal regulations and other actions during the last 4 years that conflict with these important national objectives, and to immediately commence work to confront the climate crisis.

(Opinion) The climate is cyclical. It changes over decades, centuries, and millennia. There is nothing, whatsoever, that we, as one nation or even as a species, can do about it. Climate changes. Period. America is one of the cleanest, most environmentally conscience nations on the planet. It wouldn't matter if we were 100% carbon free. China, Russia, India, Venezuela, etc. are polluting exponentially more than we do. Besides, does extorting more money from the American taxpayer help out the climate? Only in Liberal logic 101.

If you also notice, Joe keeps talking about Union jobs. He shut down the pipeline that employed thousands of union workers along with the thousands more that were indirect employees such as restaurant, hotel, barbers, gas stations, grocery stores, etc. Yep! He is all for America! NOT!

As you can see, the present regime doesn't care about America or Americans. Joe Biden made sure to undo everything he possibly could that Trump had done, even going so far as to state that the policies of the LAST 4 YEARS should be done away with. As I recall, after the inauguration, he stated that the America First policy was over, that we are a global country. That isn't how the Founders thought. That isn't how this country was made or the way our Founders constructed our government.

It's time. NOW! We are just at the point of no return. Tyranny, corruption, crime, abuse of power, government overreach, etc are the norm in Washington, DC. They are the elites; we are the serfs. They rule over us and the rules don't apply to them. Socialism is for the people, not the Socialist. This administration proves it.

With Hillary getting away with her criminal behavior (remember the 30K+ emails deleted and the smashed phones and bleached servers, along with her using a private server for classified information?). With the Obama FBI lying to the FISA Court about a fake dossier paid for by Hillary. The years long investigation and subsequent failed impeachments. It was a coup against a sitting president. Now, Michael Sussman, the ONLY person to be indicted after a years long investigation into that fake Russia crap has been acquitted. There is no justice. The far-left go free without even a slap on the hand while patriotic Americans sit in jail in DC without bail, an attorney, or even being charged with a crime, other than trespass and how can you trespass on public property?

Open you eyes, America! Everyone wants to be a patriot. Now's the time to do PATRIOTIC THINGS! It won't be easy. The Founders pledged their fortunes, honor, even their lives to free the colonies from the tyranny of King George. And we've spat in their faces by allowing this crap to happen. DO SOMETHING, ANYTHING. Stand up and protest. Vote out the corrupt, career politicians. Make sure that your vote counts by making sure that your state legislature is doing what they are supposed to do. From local to Federal, every politician should be a patriot with an America First, Constitutional, freedom-loving attitude. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM.

FARO Free America Resistance Organization. Making sure America stays free.

The Executive Orders of Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr

 Out of the 77 Executive orders signed by Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. since January 20,2021, there were 52 revocations, 8 revocations in part, 1 suspension, and 8 suspensions of Trump's EO's and 2 revocations of Trump memorandums. All of these in the first year, five on January 20^th, one on the 22^nd, one on the 25^th, one on the 27^th, the rest were throughout the rest of the year.

It isn't as if these were bad policy EO's. They were Trump's and the Biden regime was determined to do away with anything that Trump had done. From combating race and sex stereotyping, collecting citizenship status, reducing regulation and controlling regulatory costs, evaluating and improving the utility of Federal Advisory Committees, promoting rule of law, Increasing Government Accountability for Administrative Actions by Reinvigorating Administrative PAYGO, enhancing public safety in the interior of the country, expediting environmental reviews and approvals for high priority infrastructure, promoting energy independence and economic growth, implementing an America-First offshore energy strategy, Establishing Discipline and Accountability in the Environmental Review and Permitting Process for Infrastructure Projects, promoting energy infrastructure and economic growth, Accelerating the Nation's Economic Recovery From the COVID-19 Emergency by Expediting Infrastructure Investments and Other Activities, and the list goes on with Biden revoking Trump policy.

All of these Trump policies were to help Americans of all races, genders, and orientations; to help our economy grow, to make us independent from foreign sources. And Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. did away with them all with the stroke of a pen.

Not only did he derail our booming economy, do away with gains in discrimination and racism, and destroy tens of thousands of jobs, he also enlarged the Federal Government by adding new agencies and committees,

All you need to do is go to FederalRegister.gov and look up the Executive Orders signed by any President back to William Jefferson “Slick Willy” Clinton. These are the EO's signed by each President by date. I only looked at Biden's and the one's he revoked of Trump's. And, man, what a heyday he had destroying America. You don't destroy a country this fast unless it's on purpose and looking at his EO's, he was bound and determined to do as much damage as possible as fast as possible.

You can also look up every bill passed by Congress at Congress.gov/browse. That is an eye opener! With the border crisis, the country in chaos, and WWIII on the outskirts of town, it seems as though our 117^th Congress is more interested in renaming buildings. The only thing I don't like about this site is, yes, it does give the text of each bill but, if you want to know what was amended into it, it takes a lot of looking through hundreds of links and pages. Even the bills are can be hundreds, if not thousands, of pages long. Not an easy read.

Why have I done this post? Simple: to show all of my loyal readers just what this administration is actually doing to the country. Not only did they cheat to win but it was with a plan to open our borders, flood our country with illegals, make us energy dependent on our enemies, and make damn sure the Democrats won't ever lose another election. Total and complete control of the country. It's all there to see if you take the time to look.

Time to patriot up and become outlaws. We don't change government by war anymore because it's not allowed but, it's really difficult when the tyrants run everything the way they want regardless of what the people want. This is what they call a dictatorship, a banana republic, a tyrannical dominion.

#FARO Free America Resistance Organization. Time to take our country back!